TSTP Solution File: ITP001^2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : ITP001^2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 06:46:26 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.38s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 4 unt; 13 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 4 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 11 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
del: $tType ).
tff(func_def_0,type,
del: $tType ).
tff(func_def_1,type,
bool: del ).
tff(func_def_2,type,
ind: del ).
tff(func_def_3,type,
arr: sTfun(del,sTfun(del,del)) ).
tff(func_def_4,type,
mem: sTfun($i,sTfun(del,$o)) ).
tff(func_def_5,type,
ap: sTfun($i,sTfun($i,$i)) ).
tff(func_def_6,type,
lam: sTfun(del,sTfun(sTfun($i,$i),$i)) ).
tff(func_def_7,type,
p: sTfun($i,$o) ).
tff(func_def_8,type,
inj__o: sTfun($o,$i) ).
tff(func_def_11,type,
c_2Emin_2E_3D: sTfun(del,$i) ).
tff(func_def_16,type,
sK0: sTfun(del,sTfun(sTfun($i,$i),sTfun(del,$i))) ).
tff(func_def_17,type,
sK1: sTfun($i,sTfun(del,sTfun($i,$i))) ).
fof(f63,plain,
$false,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).
fof(f38,plain,
$false,
inference(true_and_false_elimination,[],[f14]) ).
fof(f14,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,conjecture,
$true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aLu5TTtCSv/Vampire---4.8_7222',conj_thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : ITP001^2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 19:02:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aLu5TTtCSv/Vampire---4.8_7222
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7385)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7386)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7389)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (7387)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (7388)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.38 % (7386)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.38 % (7385)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.38 % (7389)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.22/0.38 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.38
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (7384)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.38 % (7383)Success in time 0.013 s
% 0.22/0.39 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------